Sunday, July 19, 2009

MONCTON NEW CITY MANAGER IS A FRANCOPHONE


July 2009


The job of Moncton's new city manager has of course been given to a Francophone...Bathurst-born Mr. Jacques Dubé.


An article published February 16th,2009 titled "Should Moncton's city manager be bilingual? shows that language was once again on the agenda with city hall.


Mayor George LeBlanc said "Council hasn't made its decision, but I think that it's important the next city manager be bilingual,"

Of course you Mr. Leblanc,You would want to see a fellow Francophone get the top city staff job.


By now I think everyone knows that that what is meant by bilingual is someone who is French.


Also, Why does Moncton have a Francophone mayor? Moncton is an English city so why a French mayor and city manager? Would Dieppe have a city manager or mayor with an English surname? NOT!


Why is the English majority allowing a Francophone minority to call all the shots?


A must read for every non-speaking French person is Lieutenant Commander C.A.F. ( Retired) JOCK V. ANDREW book BILINGUAL TODAY, FRENCH TOMORROW. This book was written in the late '70s but everything this man predicted would happen has happened.Part 1;BILINGUAL TODAY, FRENCH TOMORROW pursues the implementation of Canada's Official Languages Act to its logical conclusion-The colonization of Canada's nine English-speaking provinces, and of the national capital, by French-speaking Canadians."The primary and sole objective since Mr.Trudeau came to power has been to convert Canada to a French-speaking nation.That objective will remain until every city,town and village in Canada has become French-controlled."
"Strategy is based on one fact:many,many French-Canadians can speak English, but very few English-speaking Canadians can speak French." "The way is obvious. Simply make each and every government job available only to those who can speak both languages."
"Since Mr. Trudeau came to power, the Federal Government has been sending agitators,paid by the Secretary of State's department,into every Canadian community outside Quebec in which there are any French-Canadians at all,regardless of how few. The purpose is to have the French-Canadian element demand that every service which is provided by the provincial, county and municipal governments be provided in the French language.
They are told to demand that all policeman,bus drivers, telephone operators, hospital workers,provincial and municipal government workers be French-speaking. They are organized into pressure groups to demand that stores, banks, and business owners hire only French-speaking clerks,personnel managers and managers."
"One at a time,the provinces are crumbling."



Tuesday, July 14, 2009

DR. ANDREW TRENHOLM SETS RECORD STRAIGHT


(SOURCE TELEGRAPH-JOURNAL)



Trauma doctor sets record straight Published Saturday May 23rd, 2009
A11
Dr. Andrew Trenholm Commentary


I'm not one to write a newspaper column, and I typically shy away from the media. My comfort zone is an operating room, or one-on-one with a patient. The last few months of scrutiny have been a challenge, and at times misleading. I'm writing simply to clear the air and explain my journey through trauma care in this province.



Cindy Wilson/Telegraph-Journal
Dr. Andrew Trenholm explains his journey through trauma care in New Brunswick.
I am a New Brunswicker. I was born in Edmundston and raised in Riverview. I was educated in both official languages. I spent 15 years training to become an Orthopedic Trauma Surgeon before returning to New Brunswick. Saint John was the obvious choice for my family: it brought us closer to our loved ones, and allowed me to practise medicine in a Tertiary Care Accredited Trauma Center - the Saint John Regional Hospital.
My practice in orthopedic trauma surgery would never have received any attention, but for my involvement in the care of a gravely injured patient named Donald Thomas. With his permission, I will tell some of his story.
Mr. Thomas was a 67-year-old francophone man from Tracadie involved in a serious motor vehicle collision in November 2005. He suffered for 18 hours before finally arriving at the Saint John Regional Hospital for treatment. His injuries were serious and extensive: a closed head injury, a broken neck, multiple broken ribs on both sides of his chest, a broken breast bone, a bruised heart (cardiac contusion), a collapsed lung, a liver laceration, both hips were broken, both thigh bones shattered, right knee cap broken, right ankle broken and dislocated out of joint, and lastly a broken right upper arm. His treating physician knew that his injuries could not be treated at his local hospital. Because there was no co-ordinated trauma system in place, it took many hours to get him to the right hospital.
We received Mr. Thomas in Saint John, and he spent the next 12 hours in surgery with four orthopedic surgeons, all working in concert to treat him. Two days later, he returned to the operating room to treat the remainder of his injuries. He completed his rehabilitation at the Saint John Regional Hospital and learned to walk again.
I wish I could reassure residents of New Brunswick, and in particular Northern New Brunswick, that the delay in affording treatment to Mr. Thomas was a rare and unusual case. It wasn't. We have known for some time that care for traumatic injuries would be improved with the implementation of a co-ordinated trauma system. Last year (2007-08 statistics), we treated 661 patients with severe injuries. Of the most severely injured of these, 90 per cent came from other parts of the Province. The fate of these patients impacts me, so it should surprise no one that I am passionate about improving their outcomes.
Long before the search for a Trauma Director began, I was asked to attend a meeting with our sitting Minister of Health, Michael Murphy. He was relatively new to the position, and I was admittedly passionate about the subject of trauma and the needs of this Province. Today, I offer to Minister Murphy an apology if, for whatever reason, I made a less-than-favourable impression. The feedback has been undeniably negative. In my defence, we only met the one time, and I was operating under the impression that my input was welcome. I do not fault our Minister for the deficiencies of the broader health system - he is but one person. Any "fix" will require great leadership and vision.
Last summer, the Province began to advertise for the position of Provincial Medical Director of Trauma and I was asked to submit my application. I did. It was never acknowledged - verbally or in writing. Indeed, I don't have one piece of paper to show that I ever applied. My impression, perhaps mistaken, was that I was invited to apply in order to give credibility to the search process. I applied anyway.
In the back of my mind, I always had some trepidation about my application. My concerns were not unfounded: I had been told by a highly placed bureaucrat in the health-care system that I would never get the position because I was "not French." I dismissed the statement initially, as the person speaking to me had no idea as to my French language capabilities. Many of my patients were francophone and I communicated with them in French without difficulty. I spoke French regularly with my medical colleagues throughout the Province. In addition, I had been acting as the Trauma Director on an informal basis (without pay) for the past six years, and had considerable first-hand knowledge of where the system needed to be fixed. Surely, my expertise could be brought to bear on the process in some way.
As months went on, I remained the only candidate for the job. I was not entirely surprised, given that there are only a handful of trauma specialists in the country. When I asked about the delay, I was told that the search process would be expanded to an international level if necessary to ensure there was a "selection of candidates."
The job posting for the position required that the candidate speak French at an "intermediate level." Bilingualism was obviously a necessity for the position, and I was certain I could meet this qualification. I had myself assessed and confirmed that, indeed, I could speak French at an Intermediate Plus (Level 2 ) level - a higher level than provided in the job posting. I also began working with a tutor, who expected me to reach a Level 3 (Superior) by summer.
On March 17, 2009 I completed formal language testing with the province as part of the application process, which again confirmed my capacity at an Intermediate Plus level. Shortly thereafter, it was rumoured - again through obscure back channels - that I had "flunked" my French language test. I was more than surprised by this, and contacted Dr. Dennis Furlong to address the matter. I was later told that the language criteria had been "changed" from a Level 2 to a Level 3, and that I therefore did not meet the language requirements of the job. Despite my commitment to reaching a Level 3 by summer, it was felt that I could not be accorded the position. Nevertheless, I was still invited to participate in the interview process, along with another candidate from Quebec. Mired down in this discussion, Dr. Furlong floated the idea of a co-chair scenario - one anglophone and one francophone. This proposal was more costly to the system, and would amount to duplication. I again reassured Dr. Furlong that my French language skills were equal to the task at hand.
As the proposed date for an interview approached, my candidacy was met with ever more resistance. Despite my repeated requests for privacy surrounding my application, I would wake up to Minister Murphy and Dr. Furlong discussing my application on the morning radio show. Dr. Furlong began alluding to the fact that the successful candidate would effectively have to give up his surgical practice. This was a surprising and incredible notion. If I gave up my surgical practice, there would be one trauma surgeon left in the entire province to deliver trauma care. When I asked for clarification, I learned instead that I would be paid at a rate well below other specialists in administrative positions. While no one wants to hear a physician "cry poor" over money, I can assure you that I will be paying off my medical school debt for many years to come.
Contrary to Dr. Furlong's disappointing comments on the radio, I did not withdraw my candidacy because of the restrictions it would impose on my surgical practice. In addition, the prospect of competing for the job did not scare me. I simply withdrew from a process that became mired down in politics, rumours and innuendo, that did not respect my right to privacy, and in which I had lost all confidence. I repeatedly requested a job description, but one was never provided. It came to a point that I no longer knew what job I was applying for.
While no one wants to say so publicly, this process has lost credibility at a national level. With all due respect, nothing innovative can come from a solely academic process. What looks good on paper will often not withstand the test of real life. While Dr. Furlong alludes to the well-meaning experts sitting on his trauma committees, they were not told of my withdrawal from the process during their meetings the following day. In many ways, it was as if I never applied.
I have committed to the Minister, the Department of Health, and the Saint John Regional Hospital that I will work collaboratively with the successful candidate, whomever that might be. I am also staying right here in Saint John. I am incredibly fortunate and grateful for the excellent support of my colleagues and ancillary health-care staff, and my loyalty to this province is strong. This process will not detract me from my commitment to excellence in trauma care for all the residents of New Brunswick - I simply will not be the person implementing the system.
To my patients who have also suffered through this very public process and provided their unqualified support, I wish to say thank you for the privilege of serving you.
Dr. Andrew Trenholm is Medical/Surgical Director of Trauma, Atlantic Health Sciences Centre in Saint John.

Here is the link to the entire article;


SOCIETY OF ACADIANS OUT FOR ENGLISH BLOOD YET AGAIN! FEE, FI, FO, FUM I SMELL THE BLOOD OF AN ENGLISHMAN!


The Society of Acadians is really beginning to scare me.





(source CBC)
Blood donor clinics without bilingual nurses pose risk: Acadian society
All donations screened, says Canadian Blood Services
Last Updated: Monday, May 25, 2009 10:48 AM AT Comments42Recommend9
CBC News
The Acadian Society of New Brunswick says a lack of bilingual nurses at Canadian Blood Services could increase the risk of contamination of the blood supply.
Blood donor clinics without nurses and staff who speak French have been a long-standing issue for the Acadian society.
Jean-Marie Nadeau, president of the society, said the blood supply could be at risk because of the language barrier.
"The risk of contamination [is increased] if the donor can't communicate with the nurse that asks him questions about his health. You could have a problem," Nadeau said.
The Acadian society worries that misunderstandings could arise between donors and health professionals over sensitive medical questions if people cannot communicate in their first language.
Safeguards in place
However, Canadian Blood Services is denying any health risks. Spokesman Peter MacDonald said donors must fill out a questionnaire, which is available in both official languages.
MacDonald said there's no danger of tainted blood getting into the system because all donations are screened before they are distributed.
"There is an issue that we're working on in terms of customer service for all of our francophone donors in New Brunswick, but there's no safety risk to the blood system due to this issue," he said.
Canadian Blood Services will open a new office in Moncton next year that will include 15 new jobs, and MacDonald said the new branch will offer access to more bilingual staff.

To read the entire article go to;

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/25/nb-blood-services-acadian-society-552.html?ref=rss&loomia_si=t0:a16:g2:r5:c0.0691486:b24773804#socialcomments

Monday, July 6, 2009

MPS BACK DIEPPE SIGN FIGHT






I don't think it's fair to force a business to pay the expense of adding bilingual signage and it shouldn't come at the expense of the peoples tax dollars.


Will huge corporations like Walmart and MacDonald's will get a pass like they did in Quebec.More tax $$$$$$$$$$ that could have went on health care, education and social programs.Soon someone will complain about a parrot in a pet store that said Hello and not Bonjour. This really happened in Quebec and the Language Police there wrote the pet store a fine.


In another incident the language police took out the take out sign because it was in English. What nonsense!


I believe in freedom of speech and free press and our local media and newspapers are preventing us from having our say over matters such as this. I have provided a link regarding this article in The Times Transcript. Note that many comments have been censored, especially the last ones made. I think this is wrong as everyone is entitled to their opinions.


Here is the article.



MPs back Dieppe sign fightPublished Saturday June 27th, 2009
Law student pushing Dieppe city council for bilingualism bylaw for business signs
A1
By Nick Moore Times & Transcript Staff
Efforts to force Dieppe businesses to include French and English on all their interior and exterior signage, by way of a municipal bylaw, won the support of two federal politicians yesterday.
Brian Murphy, Liberal MP for Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, and Yvon Godin, New Democrat MP for Acadie-Bathurst, have both endorsed Martin LeBlanc-Rioux, a McGill University law student from Dieppe, in his continuing bid to get city council to adopt a city language bylaw.
LeBlanc-Rioux started the process last fall and in January presented a petition to council with 4,016 names supporting a bylaw. At the time, city council was non-committal on what to do with the petition but said they'd study the proposal.
LeBlanc-Rioux said he's trying to make sure French is kept prominent in Dieppe -- a city which tags itself as the Acadian capital of the world.
Dieppe businesses with interior French or bilingual signage were recorded at 39 per cent in 2005, growing to 73 per cent in 2007. With exterior signs, the number went from 45 per cent in 2005 to 72 per cent in 2007.
LeBlanc-Rioux said a language bylaw would force national chain stores, which might not respect or recognize Dieppe's demographics, to abide by rules.
Murphy and Godin said they hoped their added voices would encourage councillors to speed up the process of making a decision.
"Dieppe could be the example for the province," said Godin, suggesting the city could serve as an example to other cities and towns in the New Brunswick -- Canada's only officially bilingual province.
Moncton -- Canada's only officially bilingual city -- has 80 per cent of its business signs in English only, with two per cent in French only and 18 per cent in both official languages, according to the findings of the New Brunswick Council on French Language Planning.
Murphy, a former mayor of Moncton, said Dieppe could be an example to the city next door.
"Maybe it's something that the City of Moncton will think in its wisdom is a very positive thing," he said.
Murphy said New Brunswick's French-speaking community has waited long enough to see language equality exhibited in the front windows of businesses, and not just on the written papers of laws, bills and motions.
"It leaves open whether there should be a renewal of provincial policies with respect to official bilingualism," said Murphy.
Both Murphy and Godin brushed off suggestions the provincial or federal governments would intervene in forcing a language bylaw on municipalities.
However, they're still calling on Dieppe to lead the way.
Calls made to Dieppe city hall yesterday were not returned.
LeBlanc-Rioux said he was confident the city was taking his proposal seriously, but hoped for an answer sooner rather than later.
"I didn't want a doctor's thesis," he said. "I wanted a bylaw."


http://www.canadaeast.com/front/article/711902
Here are some emails I received regarding this article.
1)ARE WE GOING TO HAVE A "LANGUAGE POLICE" LIKE QUEBEC??? WHAT IDOTICY!!! AGAIN, IF ANY ENGLISH COMMUNITY DID THIS WITH THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, THEY WOULD BE CALED BIGOTS!! THIS IS JUST FRENCH BIGOTRY AGAINST THE ENGLISH!!
*********************************************************************
2)Very interesting. I lived in Dieppe for 20 years as a Bilingual Acadian, English being my first language. My parents both grew up in Dieppe. When we lived there, Dieppe residents were about 50% English and French or so it seemed. Now, when visiting Dieppe, I feel more like I am visiting Quebec. It seems now that Dieppe is 50% Acadians and 50% Quebecers. If they want to live in Quebec, perhaps they should move back there. Just as an observer living outside Dieppe now, I have never seen such a waste in Tax Payers money than in the past ten years. I believe that the bylaw regarding signs is just the next step in Dieppe becoming the next Quebec City. While we are at it, why don't change the name to "Little Quebec". I was born in Quebec and lived there for 10 years as well as living in Dieppe for 20 years, and they are two places I would never want to live in again. Just thought I would share my view of the "new" Dieppe.
**************************************************************************
This one is probably from the law student.
3)...If I ever find out who you are, and with time I will, I swear I'm going to have your head ! NO ONE, but you gives a dam about your problems with bilingualism! Having more then one language in our country, reguardless of which one it may be, is an honor!To point out a fact, I'm english, but I welcome any languages in our region.We all have to live together, black/white, english/french whatever... Grow-up !
***********************************************************************
By Blogger; Hmmm, That sounds like a threat. I can't give out my ID... If I do I could end up with a pigs head on my doorstep and I am a vegetarian.
If you are such a firm believer in bilingualism why didn't you send me the email in both languages?